3 research outputs found

    Small rainbow cliques in randomly perturbed dense graphs

    Get PDF
    For two graphs GG and HH, write G⟶rbwHG \stackrel{\mathrm{rbw}}{\longrightarrow} H if GG has the property that every \emph{proper} colouring of its edges yields a \emph{rainbow} copy of HH. We study the thresholds for such so-called \emph{anti-Ramsey} properties in randomly perturbed dense graphs, which are unions of the form G∪G(n,p)G \cup \mathbb{G}(n,p), where GG is an nn-vertex graph with edge-density at least d>0d >0, and dd is independent of nn. In a companion article, we proved that the threshold for the property G∪G(n,p)⟶rbwKℓG \cup \mathbb{G}(n,p) \stackrel{\mathrm{rbw}}{\longrightarrow} K_\ell is n−1/m2(K⌈ℓ/2⌉)n^{-1/m_2(K_{\left\lceil \ell/2 \right\rceil})}, whenever ℓ≥9\ell \geq 9. For smaller ℓ\ell, the thresholds behave more erratically, and for 4≤ℓ≤74 \le \ell \le 7 they deviate downwards significantly from the aforementioned aesthetic form capturing the thresholds for \emph{large} cliques. In particular, we show that the thresholds for ℓ∈{4,5,7}\ell \in \{4, 5, 7\} are n−5/4n^{-5/4}, n−1n^{-1}, and n−7/15n^{-7/15}, respectively. For ℓ∈{6,8}\ell \in \{6, 8\} we determine the threshold up to a (1+o(1))(1 + o(1))-factor in the exponent: they are n−(2/3+o(1))n^{-(2/3 + o(1))} and n−(2/5+o(1))n^{-(2/5 + o(1))}, respectively. For ℓ=3\ell = 3, the threshold is n−2n^{-2}; this follows from a more general result about odd cycles in our companion paper.Comment: 37 pages, several figures; update following reviewer(s) comment

    Large rainbow cliques in randomly perturbed dense graphs

    Full text link
    For two graphs GG and HH, write G⟶rbwHG \stackrel{\mathrm{rbw}}{\longrightarrow} H if GG has the property that every {\sl proper} colouring of its edges yields a {\sl rainbow} copy of HH. We study the thresholds for such so-called {\sl anti-Ramsey} properties in randomly perturbed dense graphs, which are unions of the form G∪G(n,p)G \cup \mathbb{G}(n,p), where GG is an nn-vertex graph with edge-density at least dd, and dd is a constant that does not depend on nn. Our results in this paper, combined with our results in a companion paper, determine the threshold for the property G∪G(n,p)⟶rbwKsG \cup \mathbb{G}(n,p) \stackrel{\mathrm{rbw}}{\longrightarrow} K_s for every ss. In this paper, we show that for s≥9s \geq 9 the threshold is n−1/m2(K⌈s/2⌉)n^{-1/m_2(K_{\left\lceil s/2 \right\rceil})}; in fact, our 11-statement is a supersaturation result. This turns out to (almost) be the threshold for s=8s=8 as well, but for every 4≤s≤74 \leq s \leq 7, the threshold is lower; see our companion paper for more details. In this paper, we also consider the property G∪G(n,p)⟶rbwC2ℓ−1G \cup \mathbb{G}(n,p) \stackrel{\mathrm{rbw}}{\longrightarrow} C_{2\ell - 1}, and show that the threshold for this property is n−2n^{-2} for every ℓ≥2\ell \geq 2; in particular, it does not depend on the length of the cycle C2ℓ−1C_{2\ell - 1}. It is worth mentioning that for even cycles, or more generally for any fixed bipartite graph, no random edges are needed at all.Comment: 21 pages; some typos fixed in the last versio
    corecore